Friday, January 29, 2010

Put Up or Shut Up

So, it looks like President Obama is slightly perplexed, and will now have to re-think the plan to try terrorists in New York City. Either they are tragically naïve, or just plain dumb to not have realized that people were going to have a problem with having their city as a target, with terrorists in their midst for years, and having to shell out $200 million a year for security and all the other trappings that would go along with the dog and pony show it would turn into.

You gotta wonder whether the inmates are running the asylum when they keep making these bonehead moves, and false starts and stops on things. Makes them look wholly incompetent. Of course, these are the same people who can’t seem to vet people properly, without ending up with radical, weirdo, commie, perverts, as advisors and Czars. Or, the same people who can’t understand polls, or elections where a blue state like Massachusetts sends a Republican to the Senate - for the first time in decades - with a mandate to stop all the pending policy-generated legislation they thought would just sail through like crap through a goose.

And now it looks like they are shopping for another location, in anticipation of getting booted from New York City. Wow, that’s going to be a tough sell, eh? “Wanted, one willing city, or municipality, to host a multi-year show trial of radical Islamic terrorists. Must be willing to foot the bill for said trial to the tune of $200 million a year, and run the risk of becoming a target for international terrorists. Apply to the Attorney General of the United States if interested.”

Hey, I’ve got a novel idea – I get these now and then – how about President Obama have the trial in Washington, D.C.? They do have a Federal Court house there, last time I checked. And, it was one of the symbolic locations of the 9-11 attacks, if they really need the symbolism factor to sell it. I would have thought this would've been his first choice anyway, rather than NYC. I’m sure he could convince the people of the District of Columbia to go along with it. After all, they voted for him by a landslide in the 2008 Presidential election… so they deserve him. I’m sure they would welcome him, and his terrorists, with open arms. Time to put up or shut up, D.C.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Arrogance and Hypocrisy

I hate it when I’m always right. I called this in a recent post. Watching last night’s State of the Union address, our dear leader did exactly as I predicted he would. He never took the great opportunity he had, as Clinton did in his 1995 address, to make a change, pivot to the center, and focus on the issues the majority of the folks are concerned about, no…not Obama. He is way too much of an ideologue for that.

Instead, he doubled down on the issues the voters in Massachusetts rejected, and went forward from there. In his arrogant and highly hypocritical 70 minute speech he managed to lecture and blame everyone who he believed was at fault for his miserable failure of the past year, except of course himself. He insulted the Supreme Court with factually incorrect statements and impugned the concept of Separation of Powers, he scolded the Republicans for saying no to his ideas, which have turned out to be widely unpopular with the majority of the folks, he proudly boasted of his openness and transparency, while having held closed door meetings and reneging on promises to broadcast proceedings on C-SPAN, and he continually made reference to “Washington” not as a location, but as a pejorative term, like he did when on the campaign trail, trying to still act like he is a Washington outsider, not responsible for the goings on in our Capital, when HE is the President, and when HIS party has held a SUPER majority in Congress for over a year. Folks, what he has conveniently forgotten is, HE IS WASHINGTON!

He made it quite clear that he has NO intention of serving the people, as he intends to go forward with his boon-doggle health care bill, which has virtually no chance of passing Congress without more back room deals and political shenanigans, he plans on continuing to pursue “Cap & Trade” which will bankrupt the country even more than his proposed health care bill, and he even has plans to move forward on all the climate change crappola, which went no where in Copenhagen. Can you say, “Beat a dead horse?”

I guess it comes down to the fact that this administration believes it does not have to listen or answer to the folks in what they want or need, believing they know best, and that their ideas involving social engineering are tantamount to the personification of perfection and will be enacted no matter the cost or the consequences. Welcome to the Socialist States of America. Time to send a clear message in November…and again in 2012.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Problem Solved

My spies in Washington have come through. I now know, with certainty, why the Obama administration is doing so poorly trying to fix our economy. It’s a pretty shocking thing to find out, but facts are facts and it’s time to expose the truth. Obama, and his top advisors, obviously failed high school math. Yep, it’s true. That’s the reason they have no concept of anything fiscal. They have no understanding of math. My spies and I have had serious doubts now for months, but our suspicions were finally realized this weekend when Obama and a number of his top advisors were quoted giving figures to questions asked about how many jobs were saved by the trillion-dollar stimulus bill in the past year.

On one occasion recently, Obama said almost 2 million jobs were saved. Of course, he, and the rest of his mathematically challenged group included the term, “saved or created,” when referring to the number. (How do you calculate saved jobs anyway? Must be new math. As a point of reference, in all of American history the metric has NEVER been what a President has "saved or created” when computing job numbers. The concrete, easier-to-determine number of how many jobs were lost and how many were gained has always been the gold standard. There has never before been a "saved" category, EVER, until the Obama administration came up with the concept.)

Robert Gibbs, Obama’s Press Secretary, was quoted as saying on Fox News Sunday, that the stimulus bill saved 1.5 million jobs, not quite agreeing with his boss.

However, Valerie Jarrett, another top Obama advisor was quoted as saying on another Sunday news show this weekend that the stimulus package saved “thousands and thousands” of jobs. Wow, thousands as opposed to millions. She may be the most math challenged of the bunch.

David Axelrod, Obama’s senior advisor, was also on the Sunday news show circuit and was quoted as saying that he was sure the stimulus package had saved 2 million jobs. David was quite certain about this.

It is patently obvious that the problem is a basic lack of fundamental math skills, as was previously thought, and now with these latest revelations from Obama and his numerically challenged crew, we have finally been able to pin down the problem.

It should now be an easy task to single out all those in Obama’s administration who are causing all the confusion, by giving everyone concerned a basic math skills test. The way we can assess whether they pass would be to include the recent numbers that show over the last year we have lost more than three million jobs in this country, so the number of saved jobs would be, of course, minus three million. If they fail to come up with that answer, FIRE THEM.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Monumental Injustice: A Cause Worth Fighting For

A blog I know of makes a big deal out of the fact that they don’t cut and paste things into their blog, as it’s all supposedly original content, albeit sometimes very boring or not very pertinent. I, like many blogs, do occasionally cut and past articles from other bloggers or off the web, when I feel it’s of particular importance. This is one of those times. So, as usual, I won’t bore you with personal stories about my childhood experiences of skinned knees and roller skates, but will pass on to you a story you may not know about, but which needs to be told, and re-told, till everyone knows about it - and someone finally does something about it. Please post and re-post this where ever you can and get the word out about this miscarriage of justice.


Thursday, 14 Jan 2010 01:26 PM

By: Phil Brennan

There is something seriously wrong with the execution of this nation's code of military justice — it is being used against the very people it is meant to protect.


Case in point: the imprisonment of a heroic Army officer for killing a murderous Iraqi insurgent who had killed two of his men in a cowardly attack that wounded two others.

This case is reminiscent of the disgraceful prosecution of officers and enlisted United States Marines for having killed 24 Iraqis, among them armed terrorists, in a confrontation in Haditha which resulted in all charges being dropped in eight of the cases.

Only two defendants remain under the gun wielded by the fanatics of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service and the Bush Secretary of the Navy and only Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, already cleared of serious charges but punished anyway and Sgt. Frank Wuterich remain under the federal guns.


Last March, Army Ranger 1st Lt. Michael Behenna was socked with a 25-year prison sentence later reduced to 20 years for having allegedly murdered a known al-Qaida operative Ali Mansur, who was operating an al-Qaida cell inside Behenna's area of operations.


It was alleged that Mansur organized an attack on Behenna’s platoon in April 2008 which left two of Behenna's soldiers dead and another two wounded.


Mansur was first taken into custody and then later ordered released and Behenna was instructed to escort him to his home.


En route there Behenna questioned Mansur, seeking to obtain information about his terrorist confederates and the identity of those financially backing them.


Up until then there is no dispute about the facts of the matter. It was what happened then that created the controversy. During this interrogation, Behenna said that Mansur suddenly lunged at him, and he shot him in self-defense.


The government, however charged Behenna with premeditated murder. Shockingly, in the trial that followed, expert testimony that would have fully exonerated Behenna was withheld from the court.


The prosecution insisted that Behenna stripped Mansur naked, seated him on a rock and executed him.


One of the government’s expert witnesses, a highly respected Forensic expert, Dr. Herbert Leon MacDonell, Director of the Laboratory of Forensic Science in Corning, N.Y, insisted Behenna was innocent and he could prove it.


His testimony would have proven that the angle of the gun shots and the blood spatter were consistent with self-defense not premeditated murder.


But after telling prosecutors what the forensic evidence showed — that Behenna was guiltless — this expert witness was sent packing.


Dr. MacDonnell told Behenna's lawyer Jack Zimmerman, who had successfully represented one of the Haditha Marines, that he fully agreed with Behenna's account of what happened, essentially destroying the government’s case he had been called to support.


Incredibly, the key witness in the case was not called to testify in the case and was sent home.


Before he retrieved his coat from the prosecution room he told the three prosecutors that, "The explanation that Lt. Behenna just testified to was the exact same scenario I told you yesterday. Lt Behenna is telling the truth."


Behenna, he said, was not guilty, dropping a bombshell on the government's case.


Despite the fact that prosecutors must disclose any exculpatory evidence they have to the defense, they denied having any such evidence despite having been told by their own expert witness that Behenna’s explanation was the only logical explanation.


Prosecutors withholding of this evidence allowed them to argue that Behenna executed Mansur while seated when the forensic experts, including MacDonnell, agree that Mansur was standing with his arms outstretched when shot.


In a sworn affidavit, dated April 21, MacDonnell explained how knowledge he acquired while waiting to testify in the case could have changed dramatically its outcome.


"When I heard Lt. Behenna describe what happened, I did not say other witnesses were lying, or that my conclusion was based on my opinion of the lieutenant’s credibility. My expert opinion was based on the fact that the lieutenant’s description as to how the shooting occurred fit the physical evidence."


Lt. Behenna was convicted of unpremeditated murder and assault by a military panel of seven officers, none of whom had ever seen a minute of combat or ever heard a word of MacDonald's suppressed testimony.


He was sentenced to serve 20 years and now remains confined at the U.S. Army garrison in central of Kansas, largely due to the fact the evidence that would have proved he was not guilty was never allowed to be heard during the court-martial.


What happened here was a gross miscarriage of justice — a frightening example of government prosecutors running amok as they had in the shameful Haditha cases. The government's blatant suppression of evidence that proved Behenna's innocence must not go unpunished and Behenna must be freed.


His mother Vicki Behenna is a widely acclaimed assistant United States attorney who helped prosecute Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and his father, Scott Behenna, a retired special agent with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, who now works with the FBI as an FBI intelligence analyst, charge that prosecutors appear to have committed a Brady Act violation by failing to disclose such information to defense lawyers as MacDonell's crucial sworn affidavit that proves that 1st Lieutenant Behenna is not guilty.


Both parents have been heroic in their relentless defense of their son.
Vicki can be reached at Vicki.Behenna@usdoj.gov. She can use your help in vindicating her hero son.


© Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Please check out the following link also: Defend Michael

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Courting Disaster

Last year, when it was revealed that the Obama administration decided to declassify our enhanced interrogation techniques - which the CIA used to get information from captured terrorists - Obama and his pals, along with the “Lame Stream Media,” not only hurt this country by publicizing this info, but also reported the use of the interrogation techniques wrongly, and refused to publically disclose how these techniques saved lives.

Now, a year later, Marc A. Thiessen - President Bush’s head speech writer -who had full access to all the top level information concerning enhanced interrogation by the CIA, has written a book, “Courting Disaster,” detailing the facts surrounding the true story involving the how and the why, and which techniques were really used, and on whom, but more importantly, specific information on how this info thwarted planned 9-11 style attacks, and how these techniques were responsible for the capture of some of the most dangerous terrorists out there.

Thiessen, prefaces his book with an editorial remark that says that you shouldn’t be reading this book, as it shouldn’t have been written in the first place because Obama should never have declassified this info. But, now that it has, Thiessen felt that it was time to set the record straight. Please watch the video below and I would strongly suggest you also get a copy of the book, if you want to see how vulnerable to attack we now are because of the Obama administration trying to make points by trying to appease our enemies.



Saturday, January 23, 2010

America Rising

This was taken down once, but it's back up again, so watch it while you can...

Friday, January 22, 2010

Smoke and Mirrors

So now the President is worried about jobs. Gee, go figure. Why wasn’t he worried about jobs for the past year? Could it be that he just didn’t understand there was a problem with unemployment in the country? I mean, the only LOGICAL reason he would now be focusing on job creation - as a result of the overwhelming defeat in Massachusetts - is that for some reason he just didn’t know we were in a job crunch, right? Because, if he KNEW and he did nothing about it, up till now, wouldn’t that logically mean he thought other things were more IMPORTANT than job creation? I mean logically, either he didn’t focus on jobs before because he had no clue... or he didn’t care. Is there another LOGICAL reason I could be missing?


And now, we're supposed to trust this guy to focus on creating jobs, and actually do something about it, right? The same guy who hasn’t been able to accomplish even the things he actually focused on before, which were his pet projects, and which he made a mess of. This is the guy who’s going to solve the problem of creating jobs, a task he seems to not enjoy doing, in that he was forced into doing it as a result of a failed election, and one he will be trying to do at the same time he tries to resurrect his other pet projects, which he says he will still not give up on. Am I understanding all this correctly?

Tell me something, if you had a business that was in dire straits, and you hired someone who promised to improve the economic soundness of your business and improve your bottom line, and in the first year he completely dropped the ball and focused on everything else except growing your business - in fact he spent money you didn’t have and focused on projects that drove business away from yours, and after a year, any customers you had left revolted and took their business elsewhere, and then all of a sudden this guy says, “Oh! Gee! It was the bottom line you wanted me to focus on and fix? Oh, OK, no problem, I’ll get right on it, but I need to also finish those other projects I started too!” What the hell would you do?

Come on folks, this isn’t rocket science. Anyone who really thinks Obama and his boys are actually capable of fixing what is wrong with this country, and solving our problems, doesn’t yet understand that he and his boys ARE the problem. Everyone is thinking Obama is going to pivot like Clinton did, when he found himself in the same situation after the 1994 Republican victory in Congress, and move more toward the center and start involving the opposition in the decision making process and actually get something done.

Don’t hold your breath. He will simply smile that big toothy grin of his and only pay lip service to doing what the people want, but will continue the same old razzle-dazzle and misdirection, making it look like he is trying to compromise and focusing on what needs to be done. But, it will all be smoke and mirrors my friends, just like a magician doing his magic show. Obama and his crew are dyed-in-the-wool ideologues who are committed to changing this country into what they believe it should be, which, as evidenced by the vote in Massachusetts, is in direct opposition to what the people want, but more importantly, what we really need.

I’ve said it from the beginning: Just like a master illusionist, don’t be folled by the misdirection; watch what he does with his hands instead - translation - don't listen to what he says, watch what he does.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

The Plague of Political Correctness

Someone please stick a fork in me cause I am SO DONE! I’m damn tired of the B.S. political correctness we have to suffer in this country at the hands of the loony-tune lefties and the whacko progressives, who are little more than a fringe element in our society, but whom have the ear of Hollywood and the “Lame Stream Media” in this nation, so that their PC crappola has permeated through our country like the foul smell of some rotted corpse.

Let’s get something straight right now. We are a nation founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs, to which the majority of Americans follow. We also, as a society and a majority, are center-right in our political beliefs. These are facts, not opinions.

While, as the majority, we are tolerant of other beliefs, I find more and more that the fringe element, or the groups in minority, are not. Under the guise of “tolerance,” they seek to strip away any reference to the majority’s beliefs. The definition of tolerance is a willingness to recognize and respect the beliefs or practices of others. The majority does this, as evidenced by the very existence of the religious minorities who are part of this society. However, it is becoming increasingly obvious that, with the help of fringe groups like the ACLU, Hollywood, and the “Lame Stream Media,” the minority’s idea of tolerance is to negate or strip away any reference to the beliefs of the majority. Not very tolerant.

The latest rub is a flap about rifle sights being used by our military. If you haven’t heard about this, please, let me enlighten you. There is a company who has been around for nearly thirty years. The company is called Trijicon. Anyone who is a firearms enthusiast will recognize the name. They produce sights for both rifles and pistols that use tritium, a radioactive form of hydrogen, to create light and help shooters hit what they're aiming at.

Trijicon's founder, Glyn Bindon, who was killed in a plane crash in 2003, has been putting very small lettering at the end of the stock number - "JN8:12," for example - of certain sights, which refers to a bible reference that deals with the concept of the “light of the world” and not “walking in darkness,” a reference to John 8:12 . After his death, his son Stephen, Trijicon's President, continued the practice.

Because this bible reference is on sights being used by our troops in the Middle East, there are now Muslims who say the sights shouldn’t be used. The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations on Wednesday said the continued use of the sights with the religious references would send a negative message to the Muslim world.

"The use of military equipment with hidden Bible references sends the false message to Muslims worldwide that we are at war with Islam," said CAIR Legal Counsel Nadhira Al-Khalili. "In addition, these sights are a potential recruiting tool for anti-American forces, endanger our troops and alienate our Muslim allies. They should we withdrawn as soon as logistically possible."

Tom Munson, Trijicon's director of sales and marketing, said the company has never received any complaints until now. He said it has been longstanding company practice to put the Scripture citations on the equipment. The codes were used as "part of our faith and our belief in service to our country," he said.

"As long as we have men and women in danger, we will continue to do everything we can to provide them with both state-of-the-art technology and the never-ending support and prayers of a grateful nation."

"We don't publicize this," Munson said in a recent interview. "It's not something we make a big deal out of. But when asked, we say, 'Yes, it's there.'"

The military, responding to concerns by a watchdog group about whether the inscriptions break a government rule that bars proselytizing by American troops, said the bible references don't violate the ban and they won't stop using the tens of thousands of sights that have already been bought. A spokesman for U.S. Central Command, which manages military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, said the sights don't violate the ban on proselytizing because there's no effort to distribute the equipment beyond the U.S. troops who use them.

"This situation is not unlike the situation with U.S. currency," said the spokesman, Air Force Maj. John Redfield. "Are we going to stop using money because the bills have 'In God We Trust' on them? As long as the sights meet the combat needs of troops, they'll continue to be used."

Well, at least some people in the military still retain vestiges of a set of testicles.

However, with the current administration holding power, I have serious doubts about how this latest attack on our beliefs will be handled. An administration who seems to be more concerned with pushing a very far-left leaning agenda and policies, who seems to be more concerned with granting Constitutional rights to enemy combatants and giving them civilian trials, who also doesn’t seem to take the war on terror too seriously, could easily over ride the military and ban the use of these sights, or even try to bring Trijicon up on charges.

What ever happened to the rights of actual citizens of this country, like the right of self-expression? I submit that Trijicon has the right to express their religious and patriotic beliefs in conjunction with any product they make. You DO NOT have the right to not be offended. If your intolerance means you "suffer" things as an offense, tough. If this "offense" of having a few letters on a sight "alienates" our Muslim allies – which seems to me to be an oxymoron - I for one won’t lose any sleep over it.

Our “Muslim allies” in Saudi Arabia this week sentenced a thirteen year old girl to 90 lashes and two months in jail for the horrendous crime of…wait for it…carrying a cell phone. I don't know about you, but I find THAT offensive. I would hope that President Obama and his administraion would find it so too. However, I wouldn't bet the farm that anyone in his administration is going to utter a peep. Oh, by the way, I haven't heard anything about it from the Islamic organization CAIR, who is upset about the sights, either.  Go figure.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

We The People

I’m elated that Scott Brown won the Senate seat last night, I really am. However, now I’d just like to say one thing to him and the rest of the Republicans in Congress… DON’T BLOW IT!

We have sent a message to Washington with this win that the PEOPLE are tired of the current administration trying to govern by leaving the American PEOPLE out of the loop.

We also hope that this will be just the tip of the iceberg or the wind before the storm, and that in November, if anyone in Washington is hard of hearing, the wake up call will be loud and clear. This too goes for ANY incumbent, Democrat OR Republican, who continues to legislate with no regard for the PEOPLE.

If a shift in power in Congress happens in November, and the Republicans take control of both houses - or at least one of them - they need to immediately reassess what, and how it is they do things, in order to keep their jobs after the next voting cycle. They need to put in writing, exactly what they plan on doing and exactly how they intend to implement it, much like was done previously with the 1994 Contract with America, but this time, instead of using it as a means to gain power and then abandoning it, they need to be held accountable if they are in breech of contract. In addition, they need to stay vigilant and resist becoming complacent because, if they somehow survive the cut in 2010 and then renege on their promises, I can assure you they won’t be around after 2012.

I listened to Scott Brown’s victory speech last night and was heartened by it. However, we all know that anyone arriving in Washington with good intentions can be easily and quickly corrupted. I hope he is the first of a long line of future politicians who are going to Washington to do the PEOPLE’S works, with no intention of becoming rooted there for decades, all the while feeding at the trough of special interests and lobbyists. It was clearly evident that Martha Coakley was planning on being that kind of politician, as evidenced by her trip to Washington recently, where she met with lobbyists to forge their relationship.

I sincerely hope Scott Brown, and future citizen-politicians cut from the same bolt of cloth, are able to resist the traps that Washington has in store for them, starting with being courted by Obama and the Democratic leadership, which already have him in their sights. I hope that this is the start of a new wind blowing through this land, and Washington, which clears out the old business as usual, back-room dealing, influence pedaling, politicians who care not for the will of the PEOPLE, but rather for their own progressive, social engineering, tax and spend, big government ideology that has put us on the brink of bankruptcy and social decline.

We the PEOPLE will be watching…

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Hugo Chavez: Insert Foot Into Mouth

Hugo Chavez is an idiot. If anyone ever doubted that, all you have to do is listen to his latest comments on our recent attempts to bring aid to Haiti. Speaking on his weekly television show, Chavez opined that the U.S. mission in Haiti was a ruse to initiate military occupation saying, “I read that 3,000 soldiers are arriving, Marines armed as if they were going to war,” Chavez said. “They are occupying Haiti undercover.”

Forgetting the fact that all Hugo Chavez sent to aid Haiti was one stinking airplane with some supplies, let’s look at the absurdity of his remarks. First, ANYTHING this guy normally would do entails him using HIS military, pathetic though it may be. He’s nationalized almost everything in his country - like the true dictator he is - all at the point of a gun. This is the main reason he believes we’re occupying Haiti because, like Pavlov’s dog, he sees soldiers and at once thinks in terms of an occupation, and is probably feeling pangs of jealousy that he hasn’t the wherewithal to pull it off himself.

We, of course, know that the most effective means of getting aid to the Haitian people, or even our own in a similar emergency, would be to use the U.S Military, which has about the best logistical support system in the world. In addition, if you are anticipating the environment being potentially hostile, because normal infrastructure has broken down, where there might be looting, etc., then you also need the combination of logistics and a security force, to ensure the distribution of the aid in question. That equals the military. Anyone who differs on this point, name one other group who could do it as well.

In this country, in similar situations - as with Hurricane Katrina - we of course use the National Guard to provide the same aid that is being rendered in Haiti. Following “Ugo’s” rationale, we must have been contemplating the permanent federal occupation of New Orleans also.

Second, if we wanted to occupy Haiti we don’t need to conquer it by force, using the military. I’m sure if this country wanted to make Haiti the 51st State, or even just a province, all we would have to do was drop leaflets to the public in Haiti with the proposition, and they would overthrow their own government and be waiting for us on the beaches with open arms.

Chavez’s attempt to cast the U.S. in a less than favorable light is pretty transparent. He doesn’t like us. Hey “Ugo,” we get that. But, making sad attempts to disparage us, while we are rendering aid to a earthquake ravaged country, to the tune of what will ultimately be a BILLION dollars - which is probably more than all the other pittances from all the other countries combined – will be seen for what it is; pure crappola. So, Chavez, either put up as much aid and do it with out using your military, or shut the hell up!

Monday, January 18, 2010

Martin Luther King Day Special

Taken from Hack Wilson's Blog:

What a great holiday! It's just one of those obsolete holidays that you really didn't care about as a kid, except for the fact you got out of school.

I'd like to take a little time here and explore who the real Martin Luther King Jr. was.

First off, the man's real name is Micheal King. His father, who happened to be a preacher, announced to his congregation in 1935 that he was going to rename his son Martin Luther in honor of the protestant reformer, but the name change was never legalized in court.

Now let's take a look at some of King's closest advisors. First we have Bayard Rustin, King's secretary and advisor from 1956 to 1960. Aside from the fact he did prison time for both draft evasion and performing homosexual acts in public, Rustin was also a self admitted Communist, a member of the Communist Party of the USA, even attending the National Convention of the Communist Party in 1957. Some "advisor" don't you think?

It was Rustin who introduced Micheal King to another Communist, who some to this day consider a Soviet spy, Stanley Levison. Levison was a Jewish businessman and a leader of the Communist Party of the USA in the 1950's. It was King's relationship with Levison that eventually led the US government to wiretap King's offices and hotel rooms.

Levison was so involved in Communist activities, that the FBI hired two Jewish spies to infiltrate the Communist party and report on Levison. One of the spies, Morris Childs, eventually wrote...

His closest advisor Stanley Levison was a Communist, as was his assistant Jack O’Dell. Robert and later John F. Kennedy repeatedly warned him to stop associating himself with such subversives, but he never did. He frequently spoke before Communist front groups such as the National Lawyers Guild and Lawyers for Democratic Action. King even attended seminars at The Highlander Folk School, another Communist front, which taught Communist tactics, which he later employed.

King is seen in the picture above at the school. The photo was taken in 1957 at the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee, which was founded by self admitted socialist Myles Horton. Also seen in the picture are Aubrey Williams and Abner Berry, both members of the Communist Party.

A former Communist, Julia Brown, later said this about King...

We were told to promote King, to unite Negroes and Whites behind him, and to turn him into a sort of national hero . We were to look to King as the leader in this struggle, the Communists said, because he was on our side. While in the party I learned that King attended a communist training school, that several of his aides were communists and that he received funds from Communists and took directions from them. He was one of their biggest heroes.

Had enough? I'm not done yet! There's much more to cover about this so called "reverend"!

From the website martinlutherking.org...

According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, "King privately described himself as a Marxist." In his 1981 book, "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution.... The whole structure of American life must be changed.... We are engaged in the class struggle."

This gets better and better. Communist ties? Marxist ideology? Charismatic speaker? Sound like someone else we know!
In addition to being a Marxist and being run by Communist infiltrators, Micheal King also plagiarized countless "sermons". Also at martinlutherking.org you can find a list of works King plagiarized. Here are just a few:

* According to King's best friend at the time, King's very first sermon given in 1947 was plagiarized from Harry Emerson Fosdick's writing entitled "Life is What You Make It".

* "Stride Toward Freedom", King's first book, was plagiarized from numerous sources, none credited.

* One of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology", was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton.

* King's very own dissertation reportedly contained only 49% of of sentences that contained 5 or more of Kings own original words.

The list goes on and on. You get the picture.

Finally, I'd like to point out that King was a womanizer, and an adulterer. The very day King was shot, he was cheating on his wife with another woman. Way to go "Reverend".

I'd like to sum this post up by saying that Martin Luther King Jr., aka Micheal King, was a traitorous, cheating, Marxist sack of trash. The fact our country idolizes him to this day is an absolute disgrace.

Martin Luther King will never have my respect. He shouldn't have anyone's. He led a life of blatant deception in every way. But once again, people do not see behind the fuzzy facade of lies when someone is a good orator.



But hey if Google is celebrating this man, why don't we all!

Like I've said, the idolization of Martin Luther King Jr. is just another apologetic effort by the white man to make up for the past. Like I posted a few weeks ago, there are more schools, roads, buildings, and institutions named after this so called "American hero" than any of the founding fathers. Like a reader commented, it's too bad that if you're on MLK street anywhere in America, it's probably on the wrong side of town.

We live in a racially diverse nation and a culturally diverse nation. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. But when people ignore the facts and propagate sickening double standards when it comes to race, then I have a problem.

Just take a look at this story I found. "Cowboys of Color". How cute!

I say once again, King was a cheating, womanizing piece of steaming dog crap. If you read this, pass it along to someone else, until all of America realizes who the real Martin Luther King Jr. was!

Panic Mode

It’s obvious the Dems are running scared. Maybe they finally have seen the light and now understand this is a representative democracy, not a dictatorship, in that the People, and their wishes, can’t be ignored forever. This is all evidenced by that fact that the Democrats seem to be in panic mode over tomorrow’s Massachusetts special election to fill Sen. Kennedy’s vacancy in the Senate.


At first, President Obama - as late as last week - wasn’t even planning to visit the Bay State to stump for Martha Coakley, the Democrat running for the Senate seat. He changed his mind when it was realized that she lost a thirty point lead in the polls within a very short period of time, and with that also came the realization that if the seat were lost to the GOP, the massive boondoggle, aka, the Health Bill, would be in jeopardy. Obama made it quite clear in his speech yesterday what the stakes were.

What his administration is finally starting to understand is that this election is more a referendum on his policies, especially the Health Care Bill. The People had no recourse up to this point, as Obama pals Pelosi and Reid rammed through legislation that the majority of the American public doesn’t want. However, the first opportunity the public realized they had the ability to throw a monkey wrench into the works, they did - and, in a State that has been Blue for a long time. My friends, that says something.

Even if the GOP candidate, Scott Brown, doesn’t prevail, it will probably be a very close election. His poll numbers went from having a thirty point deficit against Coakley, to at worst being in a dead heat, and at best - as some polls indicate - to having a four point lead, all in a matter of weeks. That also says something. And, the Dems heard it loud and clear.

But, did the Obama administration listen to the public outcry and try to reassess that maybe, just maybe, they needed to relook at the Health Care Bill, maybe even be more forth coming and transparent by opening up the secret closed-door negotiations or maybe even start listening to the opposition and make a bi-partisan compromise of some sort? Not even close.

Their next step is to try to circumvent the normal process, in fear that a win in Massachusetts would lose their sixty vote majority, by hatching a plan that would by-pass a Congressional vote by convincing the House to accept the Senate version of the Bill, thus negating a vote for it in the Senate. That would allow them to send it immediately to Obama’s desk to be signed.

Let’s face it. It has become patently obvious that this administration doesn’t care one iota for the will of the People, believing we are either too naïve or too dumb to make decisions for ourselves and that they know best. They are hell bent on passing their agendas, no matter what the cost, even if it means driving us into bankruptcy. It’s time for a wake up call. It’s time to send this administration a clear message that this nation is still governed by, and for, the PEOPLE, not some power hungry, progressive ideologues, hell bent on reshaping this nation in THEIR image, rather than how the founding fathers envisioned it.

Friday, January 15, 2010

The Buck Doesn't Stop Here

It had to happen. It’s right out of the liberal’s standard playbook, when it comes to taking responsibility for blunders, especially if it even remotely concerns the military: Find a scapegoat in the lower ranks and blame them. We watched it happen with the three Navy Seals being Court-Martialed, and now we’re about to see some low-level Army officers take the blame for the Ft. Hood shooting spree. I wonder what ever happened to the concept that good old Harry Truman espoused, “The Buck Stops Here.” Don’t hold your breath if you’re waiting for our current Commander-in-Chief to do the same. You would turn a lovely shade of blue before that would happen.

The Pentagon's review of the deadly Fort Hood shooting reveals serious "shortcomings" in the military's ability to stop foreign extremists from trying to use its own soldiers against the United States, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said today. He was quoted as saying, "It ... reveals shortcomings in the way the department is prepared to defend against threats posed by external influences operating on members of our military community," he said. "We have not done enough to adapt to the evolving domestic internal security threat to American troops and military facilities."

I like how he used the word “We.” Of course, when it comes to punishing anyone, it will change to “them.” Maybe “we” should start placing blame where it belongs - at the top. The current administration in power is to blame for the undertones of inconsistency and confusion within our military and intelligence communities. These agencies have been sent mixed messages about what to do or not to do about potential terrorist threats or situations involving radical Muslims.

We stop little old ladies and search them at the airports, but we’re afraid to profile Middle Eastern Muslim men for fear of appearing biased, which of course we should be, as the “bias” is credible. (I can’t remember the last airplane blown up by someone’s grandmother, can you?)

We threaten our intelligence operatives with criminal charges for extracting information through legal means - which probably already has saved thousands of lives - because we are squeamish and appalled that we didn’t molly-coddle self-admitted terrorists. We try foreign, self-confessed, enemy-combatant, mass murderers in civilian court, granting them the same rights that our citizens get, allowing them to “lawyer up” where they can’t be questioned, rather than questioning them first and finding out how many more Americans are scheduled to be slaughtered, and then trying them in a military court where they belong.

Do you really expect low-level Army officers to figure out how they are supposed to react during all this contradictory nonsense being disseminated, where there are no such things as terrorists, or terrorism, but rather “man-made disasters?” Do you really think they will stick their necks out to profile a possible terrorists within their midst when the government doesn’t even do it at our airports?

Of course, now that we’ve had an incident - which this administration refused at first to even classify as a terrorist act - we’re going to punish some low-level officers for failing to recognize that this malcontent Hasan, had the potential to be come a mass-murdering terrorist, in order to pass the blame down the line rather than let it rise to the top where the responsibility truly lies. This is why Obama will never have the respect of the military, for which he holds in disdain. A true Commander-in-Chief would have taken responsibility for his actions, rather than let subordinates suffer the consequences. For Obama, the buck doesn’t stop at his desk… it’s not even in the same building. You’ll find it outside of Washington, D.C. city limits, floating around this great nation of ours. It will soon come to rest at the feet of the voters in November, and then again four years later.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Massachusetts: Battleground for Freedom - Again

If you’re not aware of the battle brewing in Massachusetts, you should be - your personal freedom and economic welfare is at stake. On Tuesday, Jan. 19th, the people of this famous Revolutionary War state will once again be gearing up for a fight against tyranny and oppression. No, the British aren’t invading again - it’s a lot worse than that. Tuesday, voters will fill the seat left open by the death of Sen. Kennedy. Why is this election important to you, even if you reside elsewhere? Because, if the Democrats lose this seat they will lose their 60 member Senate majority, thus losing the ability to ram through legislation without the threat of a filibuster. See where I’m going with this? Right. The Health Care Bill.


If the Republican candidate, Scott Brown, wins against his Democrat opponent, Martha Coakley, it’s all over for the Heath Care Bill the Democrats are trying to force down the unwilling throats of Americans. All the secret meetings currently being held by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama to hammer out some back-room, closed-door deal like what was done recently in the Senate, where votes were bought for favors, will all be for nothing. In fact, there are some who believe that if the GOP wins this seat it will be a harbinger of what’s to come in November, nationwide. Some Democrats agree, even Coakley herself, who was quoted as saying by The National Review, "If I don't win, 2010 is going to be hell for Democrats ... Every Democrat will have a competitive race." She now, of course, is denying this is what she said.


Martha Coakley

A week ago, it would have been almost unthinkable to hope for a GOP win in Massachusetts, but the polls now have the two candidates in almost a neck and neck race. There seems to be a ground swell of people who are tired of the one-sided partisan politics and secret closed-door legislation where votes are purchased with taxpayer money. The once thought “lock” for a Democrat Party Senator filling the seat in the Senate, from the state of Massachusetts, isn’t etched in granite anymore.

Health care reform has become a focal point of the race because Brown has vowed to vote against the health care package if he wins. If he arrived in Washington before the vote, he would be able to break the Democrats' 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority and potentially sideline the bill. However, there seems to be a lot of speculation that the Dems will find some way of holding up seating him, in the event he wins, to keep him from participating in the vote. If that happens, there are going to be many Americans who will cry ‘foul’ and you can pretty much say good-bye to the majority of the Democrats who currently hold power in
Congress.













State Sen. Scott Brown

If you value your personal freedoms, your economic well being and you are tired of your fate being decided by liberal elitist, power hungry thieves who use your tax dollars to solidify their power base and enslave it’s citizens by saddling them with massive debt, go to the polls in Massachusetts, or call your friends who live there, and tell them to send a message to Washington that you’ve had enough. Tell them to send Scott Brown to the Senate, to keep the wolves at bay, until we can oust them in November.

Yesterday's  Hope n' Change cartoon was on target:


Wednesday, January 13, 2010

SEIU $680,000 To Defeat Brown – Money Taken From Member Dues.

Bureau of Labor Statistics came out with this startling figure. For every job in the United States today there are over SIX POINT FIVE APPLICANTS. Another big Obama confidence builder.

By the way Obama, IN SECRET as usual, signed an executive order establishing a so-called Council of Governors. Another purely STALINIST move by MAOBAMA. This Council of Governors is to ‘provide input’ on “homeland defense and civil defense challenges facing our nation today and in the future”. The President will hand pick ten goons, er… Governors, to serve on the council and help with the synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States.

Let’s be blunt. It’s a direct assault on Posse Comitatus, the 1878 laws that prevents the military from being used as a civil police force. It’s an assault on States’ rights. It’s the HARBINGER of OBAMA’S stated plan of a NATIONAL SECURITY FORCE. It may also be the clarion call for Americans to rise up and shake off this nascent tyranny, hopefully at the ballot box, but the Founders spoke of the alternatives.

Meanwhile in the state of Massachusetts, Scott Brown has Martha Coakley sweating profusely as she makes a massive screw-up, showing the world just how weak her credentials really are when she blithely stated that there aren’t any more terrorists left in Afghanistan. One has to wonder if the lady may not have been attending classes at the Jumpin’ Joe Biden school of blatant STUPIDITY. The shock to the DeMarxists in this bastion of liberal politics is that Scott Brown is within TWO POINTS of Coakley, and Republicans and Independents in the State are energized and still gaining momentum.


Andy Stern

How nervous are they? Nervous enough to bring in the DeMarxists’ favorite goon-squad SEIU and their International President Andy Stern, whose concern for his “LITTLE GUY” membership extends to the point of taking their dues and purchasing television attack ads against Scott Brown, to the tune of SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. Keep in mind most of his membership are in relatively low-paid service type jobs. I wonder how many of HIS members are out of work nationwide? Way to go Andy, Lenin would be proud. Scott Brown can win this thing and YOU CAN HELP! Go to http://www.brownforussenate.com/

It doesn’t matter where you live.

We see that Ben Nelson is once again ‘not sure’ he’ll vote for the final version of the health care bill. Wonder what that’s about. Hmmm… Could it be he’s gotten the message that he’s toast? Yeah, Nelson, you and about 2/3 of those Commie Cretins you work with.

It’s astounding what an angry and aroused electorate generate in the way of ‘the fear factor’ with these aggrandizing scoundrels.

KEEP IT GOING!!

Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis

© Skip MacLure 2010

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Hypocrisy at Work

The double standard of the political process in this country is disgusting. For some time now, with the help of the “Lame Stream Media,” the Liberal Democrats have gotten a free ride and a “Get Out of Jail Free Card” when it comes to personal gaffs. The latest of course is the recent revelation of Prince Harry’s comments concerning President Obama, saying that then Candidate Obama was electable because he was a light skinned black and didn’t speak in “Negro dialect” unless he wanted to.

As I’m sure you can easily imagine, if it was known that any conservative politician had even had the same thought, let alone uttered the words, he would have been tarred and feathered and ran out of Washington on a rail. Case in point is of course the Trent Lott affair.

In 2002, Trent Lott made the mistake of saying, on the occasion of Strom Thurman’s 100th birthday while trying to say something nice about the old guy, that he thought the country might have faired better if Strom had been elected to the Presidency during his campaign bid in 1948, forgetting of course Strom had been a segregationists in his past. After the gaff, the liberal-left-loonies started a campaign to pillory the Senate Majority Leader, forcing his resignation.

Then Senator Obama commented on the incident saying, "It seems to be that we can forgive a 100-year-old senator for some of the indiscretion of his youth, but, what is more difficult to forgive is the current president of the U.S. Senate (Lott) suggesting we had been better off if we had followed a segregationist path in this country after all of the battles and fights for civil rights and all the work that we still have to do," said Obama.

He added: "The Republican Party itself has to drive out Trent Lott. If they have to stand for something, they have to stand up and say this is not the person we want representing our party." Eight days later, Lott of Mississippi stepped down as majority leader – not president of the Senate.

How did our dear leader respond to Prince Harry’s gaff? He was quoted as saying, "I accepted Harry's apology without question because I've known him for years, I've seen the passionate leadership he's shown on issues of social justice and I know what's in his heart. As far as I am concerned, the book is closed."

That was just the tip of the hypocritical iceberg and the double standard that exists in Washington, D.C., when it comes to Liberal Democrats getting free passes when they either accidentally or intentionally make controversial comments. As I said, it’s disgusting. There should be a standard that is followed by everyone. The Democrats have set that standard over and over again, as with the Trent Lott incident, however, that standard only seems apply to Conservative Republicans, not them, which is typical of the elitist arrogance that this group of out of touch politicians displays on a daily basis.

And the public wonders why these same people are trying to push through multiple agendas that the majority of the public do not support? The answer is very simple; they hold the public, and those who do not agree with them, in disdain and contempt, believing they are smarter than anyone else, more privileged than anyone else and therefore are deemed the ruling class, to do as they please.

It’s time to send these elitist scum a wake-up call in November.

Monday, January 11, 2010

The Ant and The Grasshopper


THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER



This one is a little different… two different versions… two different morals


OLD VERSION
The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away..
Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed. The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.

MORAL OF THE STORY: Be responsible for yourself!



MODERN VERSION
The ant works hard in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving.

CBS, NBC , PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.

America is stunned by the sharp contrast.

How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?

Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper and everybody cries when the y sing, 'It's Not Easy Being Green.'

ACORN stages a demonstration in front of the ant’s house where the news stations film the group singing, “We shall overcome.” Then Rev. Jeremiah Wright has the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper's sake.

President Obama condemns the ant and blames President Bush, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, and the Pope for the grasshopper's plight.

Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid exclaim in an interview with Larry King that the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.

Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.

The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the Government Green Czar and given to the grasshopper.

The story ends as we see the grasshopper and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant’s food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around them because the grasshopper doesn’t maintain it.

The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.

The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and once peaceful, neighborhood.

The entire Nation collapses bringing the rest of the free world with it.

MORAL OF THE STORY: Be careful how you vote in 2010.






Thursday, January 7, 2010

Breaking News


A public school teacher was arrested today at John F. Kennedy International Airport as heattempted to  board a flight while in possession of a ruler, a protractor, a compass, a slide-rule and a calculator.

At a morning press conference, the Attorney General said he believes the man is a
member of the notorious 'Al-Gebra' movement. He did not identify the man, who has been
charged by the FBI with carrying WMI's;  Weapons of Math Instruction.

"Al-Gebra is a problem for us", the Attorney General said. "They derive solutions by means and
extremes, and sometimes go off on tangents in search of absolute values. They use secret code
names like 'X' and 'Y' and refer to themselves as 'unknowns', but we have determined that they
belong to a common denominator of the axis of medieval with coordinates in every country.'
As the Greek philanderer Isosceles used to say, 'There are 3 sides to every triangle'. "

When asked to comment on the arrest, President Obama said, "If God had wanted us to have
better weapons of math instruction, he would have given us more fingers and toes." White House
aides told reporters they could not recall a more intelligent or profound statement by the President.

It is believed that the Nobel Prize for Physics will follow.





It's The Transparency, Stupid.



This would be almost funny, if it weren't so serious.

These backroom, closed-door sessions Obama is engaged in are for a reason. They are the breeding ground for the "cash for cloture" shenanigans that fueled the Senate vote, without which they would have never passed a damn thing.

I've said it from the beginning: With Obama, it's very simple. You never listen to what he says, you only watch what he does.


From a new cartoonist I've found:




Hope n' Change

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

If Only...

Oh, sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir...
















Excuse me Mr. Obama, I mean President Obama, Sir. Um . . . I know you're busy, and important and stuff. I mean, running the country is very important and -- ah -- I hate to bother you, Sir. I will only take a minute. Ok, Sir?

See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering, Sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.

Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time and says, boy, she wishes she had digs like this, you know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow!

I saw something like that in a museum once.

Oh, sorry Sir. I didn't mean to get off the track.

So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way. I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island Sir? No? I didn't think so...

Well, listen, anyway, I can't seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be "Not released" or "Not available." I'm sure it's just an oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are I have them written down here somewhere -- oh wait. I'll just read it to you.

Could you please help me find these things, Sir?

1. Occidental College records -- Not released

2. Columbia College records -- Not released

3. Columbia Thesis paper -- "Not available"

4. Harvard College records -- Not released

5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released

6. Medical records -- Not released

7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- Not available

8. Your Illinois State Senate records -- Not available

9. Law practice client list -- Not released

10. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate -- Not released

11. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released

12. Record of your baptism -- Not available

13. Why your wife, Michelle, can no longer practice law as an attorney? (Insurance Fraud?)

14. Why your wife has 22 assistants, when other First Ladies had one?

15. Why were you getting "foreign student aid" as a college student?

16. Which countrie's "Passport" did you have when you visited Pakistan in 1981?

Oh and one more thing Mr. President, I can't seem to find any articles you published as editor of the Harvard Law Review, or as a Professor at the University of Chicago. Can you explain that to me, Sir?

Oh, but hey -- listen! I know you're busy! If this is too much for you right now -- I mean -- tell you what. I'll come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, you know? I mean, I know you're busy. I'll just let myself out. I'll be back tomorrow... And the day after...

What's that Mr. President? Who wants to know these things?

We the People of the United States of America ! You know, the ones who vote.

Green Sheep

My neighbor just ordered an electric car. He paid a premium price for this one-passenger Tonka Toy to boot, about 30k. He’s been strutting around because he thinks he will now have a smaller carbon foot print. My neighbor is an idiot. He has succumbed to the left’s propaganda machine that a lot of Americans have fallen victim to. They are even brainwashing school children with this crap. Ask any kid in elementary school should we be driving electric cars and they will probably tell you yes, because it saves the polar bears and the planet.

I asked my neighbor if I had a larger carbon footprint than he would because my car runs on gas. He said of course. I asked him where he will get his electricity from to run his car. He told me his house. I said no, what company. He named the region’s electric company that most everyone uses. I told him to look up, via this nifty little utility from the EPA, how and where the company gets its energy. As with most electric companies nationwide, more than half of their energy comes from burning coal. OMG! Coal! His new carbon foot print went from what he thought was going to be baby shoes, to a size 15.

What a bunch of dim-witted sheep these liberal kooks are. Anything that feels good, is logical to them, or is what makes sense. You’ll never guess what his response was to finding out his newly ordered electric car will essently be running on coal. He said it was OK, because he could purchase carbon credits, once they pass Cap& Trade, that will offset what his car generates. At that point I seriously contemplated pulling out my .45 and putting him out of his misery. I resisted, because with all the hot air and CO2 this guy was spouting, planting him in the ground would have increased MY carbon foot print.



See Through Liberal Security





























Angie Comics

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Send Me Your Kooks, Your Perverts, Your Weirdos

Dateline: Washington, DC:


Our dear leader has named one of the first-ever transgender presidential appointees; a former test pilot named “Amanda” who used to be called Mitch. He-She began work Tuesday at the Commerce Department.

“Amanda” Simpson, (shouldn’t it be Madge or something like that?) was appointed to be a senior technical adviser in the department's Bureau of Industry and Security. The bureau has since been scrambling to figure out how to deal with the building’s restroom situation.

He-She worked in the aerospace and defense industry for three decades and most recently worked for Raytheon Missile Systems in Tucson, Ariz. According to MyFoxPhoenix, she made history in 2004 by becoming the first openly transgender candidate to win a primary -- she ran for the Arizona House of Representatives but lost in the general election. I guess the voters of Arizona aren’t brain dead after all.

"As one of the first transgender presidential appointees to the federal government, I hope that I will soon be one of hundreds, and that this appointment opens future opportunities for many others," she said, in a statement put out by The National Center for Transgender Equality, where Simpson served as a board member. And, if Obama and all the left-leaning kooks have their way, she will probably be right.

According to a 2002 article on Simpson in the Arizona Daily Star, she went under the name Mitch for 39 years until undergoing six surgeries at a cost of $70,000 to make the transition from male to female. How much you wanna bet some insurance company footed the bill for this? And they wonder why the cost of health care is so high. I wouldn’t be surprised if buried somewhere in Obama care, there is some provision for taxpayer money to fund this too.

All this in the name of diversity, being “progressive” and politically correct. But, we still can’t say “Merry Christmas.”

Monday, January 4, 2010

Ya Gotta Love it

Some people think that this blog shouldn't post political cartoons - not thought provoking enough I was told. However, I'm a believer that a picture is worth a thousand words.


Michael Ramirez Cartoon


'Nuff said.

Conservative Marching Order 2010.



This is it. 2010 and the MID-TERM ELECTIONS are right around the corner in political terms. We need to pay VERY close attention to everything that transpires this year and we cannot for one split second take anything for granted. There are some do’s and don’ts out there that we should keep foremost in our minds as the swelling tsunami of the American Conservative movement prepares to sweep the ENEMIES of our REPUBLIC from in front of us.

DO be active in your local Republican organizations. DO act to influence them to do the right things – the things that WIN local contests. I walked into my local Republican party headquarters last election cycle and it had all the excitement of a funeral parlor. They didn’t even have voter registration applications for their own county, but had them for a district two counties away. When I pointed out that this was just a couple more sets of hands for registrations to go through and more opportunity for them to ‘disappear’ or be mislaid in the mails the looks I got from our party representatives can only be described as NON COMPOS MENTIS. The SF Bay Area is notorious for voter shenanigans, these people just didn’t get it. My own registration had been tampered with twice in nine years.

Become activated, your enthusiasm will be infectious.

DO not allow the lame stream to gin up the old Trojan horse of a third party. THERE IS NO SUCH THING. Third parties are the product of fevered minds. It was a third party of well-intentioned but sadly misinformed Americans that brought us BILLY JEFF CLINTON, under the third party banner of Ross Perot, splitting the Republican and Independent vote.

We need to champion a revitalized CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN PARTY under the leadership of SOLID conservatives who will go bare-knuckled, toe to toe with the ENEMIES of the Republic and not give an inch. After all, is this not the model that the DeMarxists have taught us so well? When they snivel that they are being mistreated, all we have to do is to remind them of Nancy With-The-Smiling-Stapled-Lids having THE LOCKS CHANGED IN THE HOUSE CONFERENCE ROOMS, locking Republicans out completely.

I was listening to a statement by Mitch McConnell where he sounded like he was preparing to ‘go along and get along’ with the DeMarxist power structure in which he said he thought ‘we could work together to get things done’. Uh, Mitch, that’s NOT what the American people are telling you! We don’t WANT you to get along with that bunch of Maoists and if that is your intention leave now, for we will surely remove you and any other establishment Republican who acts or thinks like that as well.

Conservatives are on the march. There are Conservative challenges all over the nation.

One thing we need to do for SURE before 2012 is to CLOSE OUR PRIMARIES. What gave us John McCain instead of a more viable candidate was Democrat voters crossing over and voting in Republican open primary elections. The Republican leadership was so inept they allowed the opposition to choose for us. How stupid is that? Though it’s obvious now that the party had McCain preordained in a backroom deal, much like when they brought up another notorious deal-maker loser, Bob Dole.

It’s just exactly what we have to avoid this time. There are a lot of bright young Conservative leaders coming up through the ranks.

There are 435 House seats up for re-election, 36 seats in the Senate. There are 37 Gubernatorial seats up for grabs. Don’t think that the DeMarxists aren’t sweating this one out. Just ask Ben Nelson.

Semper Vigilans, Semper Fidelis

© Skip MacLure 2010

Sunday, January 3, 2010

The Whole Ball Game

Three strikes and you’re out. That’s the latest tally I'd give to the Obama administration for it’s handling of the recent terror attack on Christmas Day. Strike one was of course when it took Mr. Obama THREE days to respond to the incident. (Well, in his defense, it is awfully nice in Hawaii, and they do have some mean golf courses down there.) Of course the first thing his staff did was point out that George Bush took longer before he spoke about the “Shoe Bomber” Richard Reid. Of course, by that time there was no doubt Bush was waging a war on terror and everyone was certain of his intentions. In fact, it defined his Presidency. Obama, on the other hand, should have used this as a reason to do the same thing… however, we’re coming to understand he isn’t that savvy.

It would have been nice if he actually used the time to get his facts straight about what he eventually said when he addressed the nation. That would have at least been a reasonable excuse for the delay. Here, of course, is where strike number two rears its ugly head. Saying that this was an "isolated incident" and that this guy hadn’t acted in concert with anyone else was an obvious blunder as we now well know, it being clearly evident his ties to Al Qaeda, Yemen, past terrorists released from Gitmo and the radical Muslim cleric who also has ties to Maj. Hasan, who carried out the terror attack at Ft. Hood.

And now for strike three. Even though the Obama administration now realizes this terrorist isn’t just some mentally unbalanced lone-nut with a bomb, but rather a foot soldier in the army of fanatics who have declared war on the American people, they refuse to treat him as such, and have afforded him the rights of a citizen, allowing him to “lawyer-up” and be tried in civilian court. They could, if they wanted to, revoke his status, and treat him as an enemy combatant. This would allow us the opportunity to question him as to what other acts of terror these animals have in store for us. But, the Obama administration is more concerned with being “politically correct” and trying to show the world, and our enemies, he is fair and “just,” than he is with the security and safety of the American people. Our enemies aren’t impressed with his “fairness.” They are simply laughing and gloating over their windfall, and are free to continue with their plans.

Unfortunately, this isn’t a baseball game. We can’t strike out Obama and send him to the showers. In fact, Obama is, in reality, playing a game of golf (literally too), and he just gets another Mulligan… and we get the shaft.


 



Free Hit Counter

Copyright © 2009 - 2012 The Audacity of Logic